Entergys Customer Dashboard

Designing for Clarity in a High-Stakes Utility Dashboard

Enterprise Dashboard

|

Large Enterprise

|

Jan 2026 - Feb 2026

My Role

As a Senior UX Designer, I led this project end-to-end, rethinking the experience beyond visual updates. I identified clarity and structural gaps and redesigned Entergy's dashboard.

About the project

This was a self-initiated case study based on Entergy’s live My Energy Use Dashboard. I treated it like a real product, working within realistic technical and regulatory constraints.

Tools Used
Is the dashboard helping customers understand what’s happening or asking them to figure it out themselves?

The PROBLEM

The current My Energy Use dashboard is scattered and hard to follow. Usage, billing, and savings tools are spread across different pages, showing raw numbers without clear explanation or prioritization.

Customers have to figure things out on their own just to answer, “How much will I owe, and can I lower it?” Without forecasting or clearly surfaced savings options, this can lead to bill shock, low program use, and more support calls.

The data is accurate, but it doesn’t make things clear. The burden of understanding is placed on the user.

SOLUTION

The solution is to restructure the dashboard around what users care about most, this month’s bill, and then layer in helpful context and actions only when they’re needed.

Heuristic Evaluation

Heuristic Evaluation

Heuristic Evaluation

Problem Framing

Problem Framing

Problem Framing

User Mental Models

User Mental Models

User Mental Models

Experience Principles

Experience Principles

Experience Principles

Strategic Direction

Strategic Direction

Strategic Direction

Speculative Redesign

Speculative Redesign

Speculative Redesign

Hi-Fi Wireframes

Hi-Fi Wireframes

Hi-Fi Wireframes

Business objective

Ensuring the experience is both correct and easy to understand

Utility companies face growing pressure to reduce support call volume, strengthen customer trust, increase digital adoption, and drive participation in energy efficiency programs. By improving dashboard clarity and prioritization, Entergy can:

💵

Decrease bill-related confusion and cost uncertainty.

🤝🏻

Increase trust in the digital experience.

🛠️

Increase engagement with savings and efficiency tools.

💡

Position Entergy as a proactive, trusted energy partner.

Observing the Experience (What I Noticed)

Metrics without meaning create user anxiety

When I landed on the dashboard, I was presented with multiple cards: usage charts, comparisons, goals, tips, and programs. None of this was wrong. But nothing answered the question I instinctively had: Am I doing okay this month?

I had data, but no direction. I had metrics, but no meaning. I had to interpret everything myself, compare months, scan charts, calculate trends. That tension became the starting point for my evaluation and redesign.

Research & Evaluation

System prioritized displaying data over supporting decisions.

To better understand the experience gaps, I conducted a structured heuristic evaluation across the MyEnergy Use Dashboard, Usage & Cost, and Bill History pages using Nielsen’s usability principles. Six key violations emerged.

Mold Inspection
Mold Inspection

Fig. Heuristic evaluation across the my Energy Use Dashboard

Visibility of System Status

No clear trends or bill forecasting, making it hard to know if users were on track.

Visibility of System Status

No clear trends or bill forecasting, making it hard to know if users were on track.

Match with Real-World Mental Model

The dashboard spoke in technical metrics, while users think in months and dollars.

Match with Real-World Mental Model

The dashboard spoke in technical metrics, while users think in months and dollars.

Recognition Over Recall

Usage, billing, and savings were siloed, forcing users to piece information together.

Recognition Over Recall

Usage, billing, and savings were siloed, forcing users to piece information together.

Visual Hierarchy & Minimalism

Multiple charts competed for attention without clear prioritization.

Visual Hierarchy & Minimalism

Multiple charts competed for attention without clear prioritization.

Help Users Understand Issues

Increases in usage weren’t clearly explained, leaving users to interpret trends themselves.

Help Users Understand Issues

Increases in usage weren’t clearly explained, leaving users to interpret trends themselves.

Proactive Guidance

Savings tools were passive and disconnected from real-time insights.

Proactive Guidance

Savings tools were passive and disconnected from real-time insights.

Understanding the User

Most customers don’t visit an energy dashboard out of curiosity,
they visit when they’re concerned.

Energy is a variable monthly expense, and unpredictability creates anxiety. Users log in with simple, high-stakes questions:

  • How much will I owe?

  • Is this higher than last month?

  • Can I reduce it before the bill arrives?

They think in dollars and timing, not kilowatt-hours or efficiency tiers.

Primary Persona

The Cost-Conscious Household Manager

Profile

  • Logs in 1-2 times per billing cycle

  • Responsible for managing monthly expenses

  • Not technically inclined

  • Motivated by predictability and savings

Pain Points

  • Scattered information

  • No bill forecast

  • Charts without explanation

  • Unclear next steps

Goals

  • Avoid bill surprises

  • Understand why costs changed

  • Adjust behavior before the cycle ends

Defining Experience Principles

Aligning experience with user priorities

To move beyond cosmetic improvements, I established five guiding principles. These principles became the foundation of the redesign.

1.

Prioritize what matters now

2.

Make energy financial, not technical

3.

Surface insights, not raw metrics

4.

Introduce forward-looking forecasting

5.

Enable action in context

Redesign overview

From static reporting to proactive energy guidance

A clear insight emerged: the dashboard made users interpret everything themselves. It showed data, but not meaning. And in a high-stakes product tied to monthly bills, that uncertainty erodes trust.

The redesign shifts the experience from passive reporting to proactive guidance, clearly showing where users stand, what’s next, and what they can do about it.

1. Energy Snapshot

From scattered metrics to instant financial clarity, giving users confidence before concern.

The dashboard scattered key information across small cards, forcing users to interpret their status. By introducing a clear, financial-first Energy Snapshot with real-time totals and projections, users can instantly understand where they stand, reducing uncertainty and increasing confidence.

The new Energy Snapshot surfaces bill status upfront

  • The projected bill.

  • % change vs last month

  • Current bill so far.

  • Days remaining in billing cycle

No more digging for answers

The key numbers now hit users instantly

Financial clarity reduces uncertainty and builds trust

2. INSIGHT LAYER

From raw data to meaningful guidance, helping users understand what changed and why.

The original dashboard showed charts but didn’t explain them. Users had to interpret trends on their own. By introducing contextual insights that explain usage patterns and cost changes, the system now translates data into clear, human language.

The new Insight Layer explains what’s happening

  • “Usage increased due to colder evenings.”

  • “You’re using 15% less than similar homes.”

  • “Adjusting thermostat by 2° could save ~$12.”

Less guesswork

Clear cause-and-effect understanding

Increased trust in the system

  1. BILL FORECAST

From reactive billing to proactive planning, reducing bill shock before it happens.

Previously, users only knew their total once the bill arrived. By introducing a projected end-of-cycle cost range and trend line, the dashboard now gives early visibility into where the bill is heading.

The new Forecast makes future costs visible

  • Projected cost range

  • Trend line based on current usage

  • Mid-cycle risk signals

Fewer surprises

More time to adjust behavior

Greater financial control

4. ACTION CENTER

From passive tools to guided action, turning insight into behavior change.

Savings programs previously lived in separate sections and felt disconnected from real usage data. By integrating actionable recommendations directly into the dashboard, users can respond immediately to insights.

The new Action Center enables real-time decisions

  • Set monthly budget guardrail

  • Reduce peak-hour usage

  • Schedule home assessment

Higher savings engagement

Clear next steps

Stronger sense of control

5. INFORMATION ARCHITECTURE

From fragmented pages to a unified experience, reducing cognitive load.

Usage, billing, and savings were previously siloed across different pages. The redesign consolidates the experience around a single, structured flow: Overview → Usage → Bills → Savings.

The new structure simplifies navigation

  • Clear hierarchy

  • Financial-first prioritization

  • Related insights grouped together

Faster comprehension

Reduced mental effort

More intuitive exploration

Validation & Measurement

How I would test and prove the shift

Because this redesign shifts the dashboard from retrospective reporting to predictive guidance, validation must prove both usability gains and business impact. I would structure validation across three levels: comprehension, behavior, and outcomes.

Pre-Launch (Usability Testing)

Method: Moderated usability testing + task-based evaluation

Time to clarity → Timed task completion (e.g., “How much will you owe this month?”)

Interpretation accuracy → Post-task comprehension questions

Confidence score → 5-point Likert scale after each task

Reduce cognitive load and increase user confidence.

Post-Launch (Behavior Validation)

Method: Product analytics + A/B testing

Support ticket analysis → Compare pre/post billing-related inquiries

Engagement metrics → Track mid-cycle logins and dashboard return rate

Action CTR → Measure clicks on savings prompts

Program enrollment → Monitor adoption lift vs. baseline

Goal: Prove measurable behavior and business impact.

Long-Term (Impact)

Method: Longitudinal analytics + perception tracking

Bill variance stability → Reduction in unexpected bill spikes over multiple cycles

Forecast feature usage → Repeat interaction and reliance on projections

Customer trust score → Periodic NPS or trust-focused survey benchmarks

Success: Reduced uncertainty and increased customer confidence over time.

Key Lessons

I learned to slow down before solving

The most important shift wasn’t visual, it was reframing the problem. Taking time to understand the system, the mental model, and the business context led to more meaningful design decisions.

I learned to slow down before solving

The most important shift wasn’t visual, it was reframing the problem. Taking time to understand the system, the mental model, and the business context led to more meaningful design decisions.

I learned to slow down before solving

The most important shift wasn’t visual, it was reframing the problem. Taking time to understand the system, the mental model, and the business context led to more meaningful design decisions.

I became more disciplined about clarity over complexity

I became more disciplined about clarity over complexity

I became more disciplined about clarity over complexity

I deepened my accountability to outcomes

I deepened my accountability to outcomes

I deepened my accountability to outcomes

Thank you for reading! 🤍

Entergys Customer Dashboard

Designing for Clarity in a High-Stakes Utility Dashboard

Enterprise Dashboard

|

Large Enterprise

|

Jan 2026 - Feb 2026

My Role

As a Senior UX Designer, I led this project end-to-end, rethinking the experience beyond visual updates. I identified clarity and structural gaps and redesigned Entergy's dashboard.

About the project

This was a self-initiated case study based on Entergy’s live My Energy Use Dashboard. I treated it like a real product, working within realistic technical and regulatory constraints.

Tools Used
Is the dashboard helping customers understand what’s happening or asking them to figure it out themselves?

The PROBLEM

The current My Energy Use dashboard is scattered and hard to follow. Usage, billing, and savings tools are spread across different pages, showing raw numbers without clear explanation or prioritization.

Customers have to figure things out on their own just to answer, “How much will I owe, and can I lower it?” Without forecasting or clearly surfaced savings options, this can lead to bill shock, low program use, and more support calls.

The data is accurate, but it doesn’t make things clear. The burden of understanding is placed on the user.

SOLUTION

The solution is to restructure the dashboard around what users care about most, this month’s bill, and then layer in helpful context and actions only when they’re needed.

Heuristic Evaluation

Heuristic Evaluation

Heuristic Evaluation

Problem Framing

Problem Framing

Problem Framing

User Mental Models

User Mental Models

User Mental Models

Experience Principles

Experience Principles

Experience Principles

Strategic Direction

Strategic Direction

Strategic Direction

Speculative Redesign

Speculative Redesign

Speculative Redesign

Hi-Fi Wireframes

Hi-Fi Wireframes

Hi-Fi Wireframes

Business objective

Ensuring the experience is both correct and easy to understand

Utility companies face growing pressure to reduce support call volume, strengthen customer trust, increase digital adoption, and drive participation in energy efficiency programs. By improving dashboard clarity and prioritization, Entergy can:

💵

Decrease bill-related confusion and cost uncertainty.

🤝🏻

Increase trust in the digital experience.

🛠️

Increase engagement with savings and efficiency tools.

💡

Position Entergy as a proactive, trusted energy partner.

Observing the Experience (What I Noticed)

Metrics without meaning create user anxiety

When I landed on the dashboard, I was presented with multiple cards: usage charts, comparisons, goals, tips, and programs. None of this was wrong. But nothing answered the question I instinctively had: Am I doing okay this month?

I had data, but no direction. I had metrics, but no meaning. I had to interpret everything myself, compare months, scan charts, calculate trends. That tension became the starting point for my evaluation and redesign.

Research & Evaluation

System prioritized displaying data over supporting decisions.

To better understand the experience gaps, I conducted a structured heuristic evaluation across the MyEnergy Use Dashboard, Usage & Cost, and Bill History pages using Nielsen’s usability principles. Six key violations emerged.

Mold Inspection
Mold Inspection

Fig. Heuristic evaluation across the my Energy Use Dashboard

Visibility of System Status

No clear trends or bill forecasting, making it hard to know if users were on track.

Visibility of System Status

No clear trends or bill forecasting, making it hard to know if users were on track.

Match with Real-World Mental Model

The dashboard spoke in technical metrics, while users think in months and dollars.

Match with Real-World Mental Model

The dashboard spoke in technical metrics, while users think in months and dollars.

Recognition Over Recall

Usage, billing, and savings were siloed, forcing users to piece information together.

Recognition Over Recall

Usage, billing, and savings were siloed, forcing users to piece information together.

Visual Hierarchy & Minimalism

Multiple charts competed for attention without clear prioritization.

Visual Hierarchy & Minimalism

Multiple charts competed for attention without clear prioritization.

Help Users Understand Issues

Increases in usage weren’t clearly explained, leaving users to interpret trends themselves.

Help Users Understand Issues

Increases in usage weren’t clearly explained, leaving users to interpret trends themselves.

Proactive Guidance

Savings tools were passive and disconnected from real-time insights.

Proactive Guidance

Savings tools were passive and disconnected from real-time insights.

Understanding the User

Most customers don’t visit an energy dashboard out of curiosity,
they visit when they’re concerned.

Energy is a variable monthly expense, and unpredictability creates anxiety. Users log in with simple, high-stakes questions:

  • How much will I owe?

  • Is this higher than last month?

  • Can I reduce it before the bill arrives?

They think in dollars and timing, not kilowatt-hours or efficiency tiers.

Primary Persona

The Cost-Conscious Household Manager

Profile

  • Logs in 1-2 times per billing cycle

  • Responsible for managing monthly expenses

  • Not technically inclined

  • Motivated by predictability and savings

Pain Points

  • Scattered information

  • No bill forecast

  • Charts without explanation

  • Unclear next steps

Goals

  • Avoid bill surprises

  • Understand why costs changed

  • Adjust behavior before the cycle ends

Defining Experience Principles

Aligning experience with user priorities

To move beyond cosmetic improvements, I established five guiding principles. These principles became the foundation of the redesign.

1.

Prioritize what matters now

2.

Make energy financial, not technical

3.

Surface insights, not raw metrics

4.

Introduce forward-looking forecasting

5.

Enable action in context

Redesign overview

From static reporting to proactive energy guidance

A clear insight emerged: the dashboard made users interpret everything themselves. It showed data, but not meaning. And in a high-stakes product tied to monthly bills, that uncertainty erodes trust.

The redesign shifts the experience from passive reporting to proactive guidance, clearly showing where users stand, what’s next, and what they can do about it.

1. Energy Snapshot

From scattered metrics to instant financial clarity, giving users confidence before concern.

The dashboard scattered key information across small cards, forcing users to interpret their status. By introducing a clear, financial-first Energy Snapshot with real-time totals and projections, users can instantly understand where they stand, reducing uncertainty and increasing confidence.

The new Energy Snapshot surfaces bill status upfront

  • The projected bill.

  • % change vs last month

  • Current bill so far.

  • Days remaining in billing cycle

No more digging for answers

The key numbers now hit users instantly

Financial clarity reduces uncertainty and builds trust

2. INSIGHT LAYER

From raw data to meaningful guidance, helping users understand what changed and why.

The original dashboard showed charts but didn’t explain them. Users had to interpret trends on their own. By introducing contextual insights that explain usage patterns and cost changes, the system now translates data into clear, human language.

The new Insight Layer explains what’s happening

  • “Usage increased due to colder evenings.”

  • “You’re using 15% less than similar homes.”

  • “Adjusting thermostat by 2° could save ~$12.”

Less guesswork

Clear cause-and-effect understanding

Increased trust in the system

  1. BILL FORECAST

From reactive billing to proactive planning, reducing bill shock before it happens.

Previously, users only knew their total once the bill arrived. By introducing a projected end-of-cycle cost range and trend line, the dashboard now gives early visibility into where the bill is heading.

The new Forecast makes future costs visible

  • Projected cost range

  • Trend line based on current usage

  • Mid-cycle risk signals

Fewer surprises

More time to adjust behavior

Greater financial control

4. ACTION CENTER

From passive tools to guided action, turning insight into behavior change.

Savings programs previously lived in separate sections and felt disconnected from real usage data. By integrating actionable recommendations directly into the dashboard, users can respond immediately to insights.

The new Action Center enables real-time decisions

  • Set monthly budget guardrail

  • Reduce peak-hour usage

  • Schedule home assessment

Higher savings engagement

Clear next steps

Stronger sense of control

5. INFORMATION ARCHITECTURE

From fragmented pages to a unified experience, reducing cognitive load.

Usage, billing, and savings were previously siloed across different pages. The redesign consolidates the experience around a single, structured flow: Overview → Usage → Bills → Savings.

The new structure simplifies navigation

  • Clear hierarchy

  • Financial-first prioritization

  • Related insights grouped together

Faster comprehension

Reduced mental effort

More intuitive exploration

Validation & Measurement

How I would test and prove the shift

Because this redesign shifts the dashboard from retrospective reporting to predictive guidance, validation must prove both usability gains and business impact. I would structure validation across three levels: comprehension, behavior, and outcomes.

Pre-Launch (Usability Testing)

Method: Moderated usability testing + task-based evaluation

Time to clarity → Timed task completion (e.g., “How much will you owe this month?”)

Interpretation accuracy → Post-task comprehension questions

Confidence score → 5-point Likert scale after each task

Reduce cognitive load and increase user confidence.

Post-Launch (Behavior Validation)

Method: Product analytics + A/B testing

Support ticket analysis → Compare pre/post billing-related inquiries

Engagement metrics → Track mid-cycle logins and dashboard return rate

Action CTR → Measure clicks on savings prompts

Program enrollment → Monitor adoption lift vs. baseline

Goal: Prove measurable behavior and business impact.

Long-Term (Impact)

Method: Longitudinal analytics + perception tracking

Bill variance stability → Reduction in unexpected bill spikes over multiple cycles

Forecast feature usage → Repeat interaction and reliance on projections

Customer trust score → Periodic NPS or trust-focused survey benchmarks

Success: Reduced uncertainty and increased customer confidence over time.

Key Lessons

I learned to slow down before solving

The most important shift wasn’t visual, it was reframing the problem. Taking time to understand the system, the mental model, and the business context led to more meaningful design decisions.

I learned to slow down before solving

The most important shift wasn’t visual, it was reframing the problem. Taking time to understand the system, the mental model, and the business context led to more meaningful design decisions.

I learned to slow down before solving

The most important shift wasn’t visual, it was reframing the problem. Taking time to understand the system, the mental model, and the business context led to more meaningful design decisions.

I became more disciplined about clarity over complexity

I became more disciplined about clarity over complexity

I became more disciplined about clarity over complexity

I deepened my accountability to outcomes

I deepened my accountability to outcomes

I deepened my accountability to outcomes

Thank you for reading! 🤍

Entergys Customer Dashboard

Designing for Clarity in a High-Stakes Utility Dashboard

Enterprise Dashboard

|

Large Enterprise

|

Jan 2026 - Feb 2026

My Role

As a Senior UX Designer, I led this project end-to-end, rethinking the experience beyond visual updates. I identified clarity and structural gaps and redesigned Entergy's dashboard.

About the project

This was a self-initiated case study based on Entergy’s live My Energy Use Dashboard. I treated it like a real product, working within realistic technical and regulatory constraints.

Tools Used
Is the dashboard helping customers understand what’s happening or asking them to figure it out themselves?

The PROBLEM

The current My Energy Use dashboard is scattered and hard to follow. Usage, billing, and savings tools are spread across different pages, showing raw numbers without clear explanation or prioritization.

Customers have to figure things out on their own just to answer, “How much will I owe, and can I lower it?” Without forecasting or clearly surfaced savings options, this can lead to bill shock, low program use, and more support calls.

The data is accurate, but it doesn’t make things clear. The burden of understanding is placed on the user.

SOLUTION

The solution is to restructure the dashboard around what users care about most, this month’s bill, and then layer in helpful context and actions only when they’re needed.

Heuristic Evaluation

Heuristic Evaluation

Heuristic Evaluation

Problem Framing

Problem Framing

Problem Framing

User Mental Models

User Mental Models

User Mental Models

Experience Principles

Experience Principles

Experience Principles

Strategic Direction

Strategic Direction

Strategic Direction

Speculative Redesign

Speculative Redesign

Speculative Redesign

Hi-Fi Wireframes

Hi-Fi Wireframes

Hi-Fi Wireframes

Business objective

Ensuring the experience is both correct and easy to understand

Utility companies face growing pressure to reduce support call volume, strengthen customer trust, increase digital adoption, and drive participation in energy efficiency programs. By improving dashboard clarity and prioritization, Entergy can:

💵

Decrease bill-related confusion and cost uncertainty.

🤝🏻

Increase trust in the digital experience.

🛠️

Increase engagement with savings and efficiency tools.

💡

Position Entergy as a proactive, trusted energy partner.

Observing the Experience (What I Noticed)

Metrics without meaning create user anxiety

When I landed on the dashboard, I was presented with multiple cards: usage charts, comparisons, goals, tips, and programs. None of this was wrong. But nothing answered the question I instinctively had: Am I doing okay this month?

I had data, but no direction. I had metrics, but no meaning. I had to interpret everything myself, compare months, scan charts, calculate trends. That tension became the starting point for my evaluation and redesign.

Research & Evaluation

System prioritized displaying data over supporting decisions.

To better understand the experience gaps, I conducted a structured heuristic evaluation across the MyEnergy Use Dashboard, Usage & Cost, and Bill History pages using Nielsen’s usability principles. Six key violations emerged.

Mold Inspection
Mold Inspection

Fig. Heuristic evaluation across the my Energy Use Dashboard

Visibility of System Status

No clear trends or bill forecasting, making it hard to know if users were on track.

Visibility of System Status

No clear trends or bill forecasting, making it hard to know if users were on track.

Match with Real-World Mental Model

The dashboard spoke in technical metrics, while users think in months and dollars.

Match with Real-World Mental Model

The dashboard spoke in technical metrics, while users think in months and dollars.

Recognition Over Recall

Usage, billing, and savings were siloed, forcing users to piece information together.

Recognition Over Recall

Usage, billing, and savings were siloed, forcing users to piece information together.

Visual Hierarchy & Minimalism

Multiple charts competed for attention without clear prioritization.

Visual Hierarchy & Minimalism

Multiple charts competed for attention without clear prioritization.

Help Users Understand Issues

Increases in usage weren’t clearly explained, leaving users to interpret trends themselves.

Help Users Understand Issues

Increases in usage weren’t clearly explained, leaving users to interpret trends themselves.

Proactive Guidance

Savings tools were passive and disconnected from real-time insights.

Proactive Guidance

Savings tools were passive and disconnected from real-time insights.

Understanding the User

Most customers don’t visit an energy dashboard out of curiosity,
they visit when they’re concerned.

Energy is a variable monthly expense, and unpredictability creates anxiety. Users log in with simple, high-stakes questions:

  • How much will I owe?

  • Is this higher than last month?

  • Can I reduce it before the bill arrives?

They think in dollars and timing, not kilowatt-hours or efficiency tiers.

Primary Persona

The Cost-Conscious Household Manager

Profile

  • Logs in 1-2 times per billing cycle

  • Responsible for managing monthly expenses

  • Not technically inclined

  • Motivated by predictability and savings

Pain Points

  • Scattered information

  • No bill forecast

  • Charts without explanation

  • Unclear next steps

Goals

  • Avoid bill surprises

  • Understand why costs changed

  • Adjust behavior before the cycle ends

Defining Experience Principles

Aligning experience with user priorities

To move beyond cosmetic improvements, I established five guiding principles. These principles became the foundation of the redesign.

1.

Prioritize what matters now

2.

Make energy financial, not technical

3.

Surface insights, not raw metrics

4.

Introduce forward-looking forecasting

5.

Enable action in context

Redesign overview

From static reporting to proactive energy guidance

A clear insight emerged: the dashboard made users interpret everything themselves. It showed data, but not meaning. And in a high-stakes product tied to monthly bills, that uncertainty erodes trust.

The redesign shifts the experience from passive reporting to proactive guidance, clearly showing where users stand, what’s next, and what they can do about it.

1. Energy Snapshot

From scattered metrics to instant financial clarity, giving users confidence before concern.

The dashboard scattered key information across small cards, forcing users to interpret their status. By introducing a clear, financial-first Energy Snapshot with real-time totals and projections, users can instantly understand where they stand, reducing uncertainty and increasing confidence.

The new Energy Snapshot surfaces bill status upfront

  • The projected bill.

  • % change vs last month

  • Current bill so far.

  • Days remaining in billing cycle

No more digging for answers

The key numbers now hit users instantly

Financial clarity reduces uncertainty and builds trust

2. INSIGHT LAYER

From raw data to meaningful guidance, helping users understand what changed and why.

The original dashboard showed charts but didn’t explain them. Users had to interpret trends on their own. By introducing contextual insights that explain usage patterns and cost changes, the system now translates data into clear, human language.

The new Insight Layer explains what’s happening

  • “Usage increased due to colder evenings.”

  • “You’re using 15% less than similar homes.”

  • “Adjusting thermostat by 2° could save ~$12.”

Less guesswork

Clear cause-and-effect understanding

Increased trust in the system

  1. BILL FORECAST

From reactive billing to proactive planning, reducing bill shock before it happens.

Previously, users only knew their total once the bill arrived. By introducing a projected end-of-cycle cost range and trend line, the dashboard now gives early visibility into where the bill is heading.

The new Forecast makes future costs visible

  • Projected cost range

  • Trend line based on current usage

  • Mid-cycle risk signals

Fewer surprises

More time to adjust behavior

Greater financial control

4. ACTION CENTER

From passive tools to guided action, turning insight into behavior change.

Savings programs previously lived in separate sections and felt disconnected from real usage data. By integrating actionable recommendations directly into the dashboard, users can respond immediately to insights.

The new Action Center enables real-time decisions

  • Set monthly budget guardrail

  • Reduce peak-hour usage

  • Schedule home assessment

Higher savings engagement

Clear next steps

Stronger sense of control

5. INFORMATION ARCHITECTURE

From fragmented pages to a unified experience, reducing cognitive load.

Usage, billing, and savings were previously siloed across different pages. The redesign consolidates the experience around a single, structured flow: Overview → Usage → Bills → Savings.

The new structure simplifies navigation

  • Clear hierarchy

  • Financial-first prioritization

  • Related insights grouped together

Faster comprehension

Reduced mental effort

More intuitive exploration

Validation & Measurement

How I would test and prove the shift

Because this redesign shifts the dashboard from retrospective reporting to predictive guidance, validation must prove both usability gains and business impact. I would structure validation across three levels: comprehension, behavior, and outcomes.

Pre-Launch (Usability Testing)

Method: Moderated usability testing + task-based evaluation

Time to clarity → Timed task completion (e.g., “How much will you owe this month?”)

Interpretation accuracy → Post-task comprehension questions

Confidence score → 5-point Likert scale after each task

Reduce cognitive load and increase user confidence.

Post-Launch (Behavior Validation)

Method: Product analytics + A/B testing

Support ticket analysis → Compare pre/post billing-related inquiries

Engagement metrics → Track mid-cycle logins and dashboard return rate

Action CTR → Measure clicks on savings prompts

Program enrollment → Monitor adoption lift vs. baseline

Goal: Prove measurable behavior and business impact.

Long-Term (Impact)

Method: Longitudinal analytics + perception tracking

Bill variance stability → Reduction in unexpected bill spikes over multiple cycles

Forecast feature usage → Repeat interaction and reliance on projections

Customer trust score → Periodic NPS or trust-focused survey benchmarks

Success: Reduced uncertainty and increased customer confidence over time.

Key Lessons

I learned to slow down before solving

The most important shift wasn’t visual, it was reframing the problem. Taking time to understand the system, the mental model, and the business context led to more meaningful design decisions.

I learned to slow down before solving

The most important shift wasn’t visual, it was reframing the problem. Taking time to understand the system, the mental model, and the business context led to more meaningful design decisions.

I learned to slow down before solving

The most important shift wasn’t visual, it was reframing the problem. Taking time to understand the system, the mental model, and the business context led to more meaningful design decisions.

I became more disciplined about clarity over complexity

I became more disciplined about clarity over complexity

I became more disciplined about clarity over complexity

I deepened my accountability to outcomes

I deepened my accountability to outcomes

I deepened my accountability to outcomes

Thank you for reading! 🤍